Here are some great words from Hilary of Poitiers (d. 367) found in Book One of his work On the Trinity:
At the close of Book One, Hilary offers the following prayer:For he is the best student who does not read his thoughts into the book, but lets it reveal its own; who draws from it its sense, and does not import his own into it, nor force upon its words a meaning which he had determined was the right one before he opened its pages.
Since then we are to discourse of the things of God, let us assume that God has full knowledge of Himself, and bow with humble reverence to His words. For He Whom we can only know through His own utterances is the fitting witness concerning Himself.
I know, O Lord God Almighty, that I owe Thee, as the chief duty of my life, the devotion of all my words and thoughts to Thyself. The gift of speech which Thou hast bestowed can bring me no higher reward than the opportunity of service in preaching Thee and displaying Thee as Thou art, as Father and Father of God the Only-begotten, to the world in its blindness and the heretic in his rebellion.
But this is the mere expression of my own desire; I must pray also for the gift of Thy help and compassion, that the breath of Thy Spirit may fill the sails of faith and confession which I have spread, and a favouring wind be sent to forward me on my voyage of instruction.
We can trust the promise of Him Who said, Ask, and it shall be given you, seek, and ye shall find, knock, and it shall be opened unto you
and we in our want shall pray for the things we need. We shall bring an untiring energy to the study of Thy Prophets and Apostles, and we shall knock for entrance at every gate of hidden knowledge, but it is Thine to answer the prayer, to grant the thing we seek, to open the door on which we beat.
Our minds are born with dull and clouded vision, our feeble intellect is penned within the barriers of an impassable ignorance concerning things Divine; but the study of Thy revelation elevates our soul to the comprehension of sacred truth, and submission to the faith is the path to a certainty beyond the reach of unassisted reason.
And therefore we look to Thy support for the first trembling steps of this undertaking, to Thy aid that it may gain strength and prosper. We look to Thee to give us the fellowship of that Spirit Who guided the Prophets and the Apostles, that we may take their words in the sense in which they spoke and assign its right shade of meaning to every
utterance. For we shall speak of things which they preached in a mystery; of Thee, O God Eternal, Father of the Eternal and Only-begotten God, Who alone art without birth, and of the One Lord Jesus Christ, born of Thee from everlasting. We may not sever Him from Thee, or make Him one of a plurality of Gods, on any plea of difference of nature.
We may not say that He is not begotten of Thee, because Thou art One. We must not fail to confess Him as true God, seeing that He is born of Thee, true God, His Father. Grant us, therefore, precision of language, soundness of argument, grace of style, loyalty to truth.
Enable us to utter the things that we believe, that so we may confess, as Prophets and Apostles have taught us, Thee, One God our Father, and One Lord Jesus Christ, and put to silence the gainsaying of heretics, proclaiming Thee as God, yet not solitary, and Him as God, in no unreal sense.
1 comment:
Brother Martin,
I find this quote from Hilary quite timely in light of our discussion on the Knowing the Truth radio broadcast, Tuesday, Nov. 17. Please do not construe my comment as in anyway unloving or unkind, though it involves a measure of criticism.
The capitulation of the Evangelical and Reformed church to either theistic evolution (God-directed evolution) or progressive creation (God-directed punctuated equilibrium)violates what Hillary espouses. Clearly, most modern Reformed and Evangelical exegetes and scholars have exalted the extremely tenuous and ever-shifting findings of modern science ABOVE the Word of God. Over and over you read in their works that the Bible and science cannot disagree. So, instead of interpreting nature in light of the Word of God, they interpret the Bible in light of the tentative and shifting "findings" of modern science. If that practice is not "risking truth", then, pray tell me dear sir, what is?
Hillary: "For he is the best student who does not read his thoughts into the book,..."
Repeatedly, modern Evang. & Reformed OT scholars argue that the Bible and Science cannot disagree, that the evidence for an old universe (and all the baggage that comes with it) is so overwhelming, we must alter our interpretation of the Bible to preserve its witness. This practice is beyond "risking the truth." It is compromising the truth. It is intellectual idolatry to think we know better than God in the area of origins, that is, if Hillary is correct in what he is saying. I assume you quote him because you agree with him. We in the Reformed and Evangelical camp readily point our fingers at the heresy of others, but apparently we missed this one which is in our midst. Or, we simply all agreed this heresy was acceptable.
Hillary: "...but let it reveal its own; who draws from it its sense, and does not import his own into it, nor force upon its words a meaning which he had determined was the right one before he opened its pages."
This quote is profound. This hermeneutic, reflected in the Westminster Confession, has been jettisoned in the American Evangelical and Reformed seminary. Or, maybe a fairer statement would be that it is applied only outside of Genesis 1-11. Kline, Collins, Sailhamer, Walton, Waltke, et. al., bring their scientific predilections, philosophical presuppositions and unhealthy views of Scripture to the text and then maul it to pieces where it disagrees with the "findings of modern science." I contend that the failure of your book to address this bogus hermeneutic is "risking the truth."
Hillary: "...but the study of Thy revelation elevates our soul to the comprehension of sacred truth, and submission to the faith is the path to a certainty beyond the reach of unassisted reason."
As far as the ID movement is concerned, it pays no attention to the Bible. They intentionally avoid anything "metaphysical." This is an incredible epistemological blunder on their part. Please call them to task in your next book. Otherwise, you will be "risking the truth."
The failure of the book to include and address the hottest issue in the church since the publication of Darwin’s The Origin of Species in 1859 makes the book less useful. I was incredulous when I read the Hillary quote. He is so much more eloquent than I. Brother, if you will not hear my plea, listen to Hillary.
Thanks again for your hard work on this book and for your zeal for the truth. May that zeal expand to include the literal, simple truth of Genesis 1-11 which is foundational for the Gospel and a Biblical world-and-life view.
Jon Orcutt , caller from Gray Court
Post a Comment